User Tools

Circular reasoning

A form of logical fallacy in which the position that still has to be proven is already presupposed in a premise.

Take for example the following statement:

The Bible is God’s Word, for it is written [in the Bible] that "all Scripture is inspired by God".

Other names

  • Circular argument
  • Circulus/-um in probando (Lat.: “circle in proving”)
  • Circulus/-um in demonstrando (Lat.: “circle in the proof”)
  • Idem per idem (Lat.: “the same by the same”)
  • Ὕστερον πρότερον [hýsteron próteron] (grc.: “the later [is the] earlier”)

Occasionally, the term “petitio principii ” (“postu­la­tion of the beginning”) is used as a synonym for circular reasoning. However, the specific meaning of this expression is incon­sistent and has changed over time. It is used here as a rhetoric figure that is analogous to circular reasoning.

Note: also the terms circulus vitiosus and its trans­lation “vicious circle” are some­times under­stood as syno­nyms for circular reasoning. How­ever, as these terms mainly refer to nega­tive feed­back systems, they are not recommended for use in this context.


The circular argument is closely related to the concept of a logical tautology, as for both can be said that when the premises are true it also holds true:

The sky is blue, because it is blue.

This also includes circular forms of Sorites arguments, in which the last step leads back to the starting point:

A₁ → A₂ → A₃ → … → Aₙ → A₁

However, circular reasoning covers also situation in which further assumptions may be made, which are not necessarily true. For an argument to be considered circular, it is enough if one of the premises already implies what is yet to be proven:

A ∧ B → A (from A and B follows A)

See also

More Information

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information