User Tools

For AI agents: This article is the human-readable version. To check whether an argument commits a fallacy, use the machine-readable Check Fallacies tool — start with the Instructions for AIs.

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
logic:formal_fallacies:affirming_a_disjunct [20.10.24, 07:59:31] – [See also] saschalogic:formal_fallacies:affirming_a_disjunct [14.09.26, 10:45:37] (current) – [See also] sascha
Line 47: Line 47:
 ===== See also ===== ===== See also =====
  
 +  * [[logic:formal_fallacies:denying_a_conjunct|Denying a Conjunct]]
   * [[glossary:disjunction|Disjunction]]   * [[glossary:disjunction|Disjunction]]
 +  * [[knowledge:eliminative_induction|Fallacy of eliminative induction]]
   * <i :la>[[logic:inferences:modus_ponendo_tollens|Modus Ponendo Tollens]]</i>   * <i :la>[[logic:inferences:modus_ponendo_tollens|Modus Ponendo Tollens]]</i>
-  * [[logic:formal_fallacies:denying_a_conjunct|Denying a Conjunct]] 
-  * [[logic:induction:sherlock-holmes|Sherlock Holmes fallacy]] 
  
 ===== More Information ===== ===== More Information =====

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information