User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
logic:inferences:destructive_dilemma [29.01.25, 09:08:06] – [Description] saschalogic:inferences:destructive_dilemma [02.05.26, 19:12:25] (current) – [Description] admin
Line 28: Line 28:
 The relationships between the various statements in a constructive dilemma can best be explained by showing them as a diagram: The relationships between the various statements in a constructive dilemma can best be explained by showing them as a diagram:
  
-<aside box><figure>{{:logic:inferences:destructive_dilemma.svg|Destructive dilemma}}<figcaption>+<aside box><figure>{{:logic:inferences:destructive_dilemma.svg?nolink|Destructive dilemma}}<figcaption>
 In this diagram, the two [[glossary:conditional|conditional statements]] are displayed as [[glossary:universal_quantification|universal quantifications]] to make it easier to understand how they are connected. This is possible because any (material) //conditional// can be transformed into a //universal quantification// (from “''when A, then B''” follows that “''all A are B''”). In this diagram, the two [[glossary:conditional|conditional statements]] are displayed as [[glossary:universal_quantification|universal quantifications]] to make it easier to understand how they are connected. This is possible because any (material) //conditional// can be transformed into a //universal quantification// (from “''when A, then B''” follows that “''all A are B''”).
  

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information