Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- logic:inferences:constructive_dilemma [02.05.26, 19:12:48] – [Description] admin
+++ logic:inferences:constructive_dilemma [22.08.26, 08:07:19] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation sascha
@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 <aside info>
-**Note:** All examples here (and indeed in most other places elsewhere) are explicitly based on [[glossary:adjunction|adjunctions]], i.e. they use an //inclusive// ‘or’. In fact, it is indeed also possible to construct a //destructive dilemma// based on a [[glossary:contravalence|contravalence]] instead. However, this can lead to certain complications, not least to the possibility of creating a “[[relevancy:false_dilemma|false dilemma]]”, which consist in postulating a //dichotomy// where none really exists.
+**Note:** All examples here (and indeed in most other places elsewhere) are explicitly based on [[glossary:adjunction|adjunctions]], i.e. they use an //inclusive// ‘or’. In fact, it is indeed also possible to construct a //destructive dilemma// based on a [[glossary:contravalence|contravalence]] instead. However, this can lead to certain complications, not least to the possibility of creating a “[[relevance:false_dilemma|false dilemma]]”, which consist in postulating a //dichotomy// where none really exists.
 </aside>
@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
   * [[logic:inferences:destructive_dilemma|Destructive Dilemma]]
-  * [[relevancy:false_dilemma|False dilemma]]
+  * [[relevance:false_dilemma|False dilemma]]
   * [[logic:inferences:modus_ponens|Modus Ponens]]

Fallacies Online

User Tools

Differences