User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
logic:inferences:modus_barbara:modus_barbari [25.05.22, 21:59:19] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation adminlogic:inferences:modus_barbara:modus_barbari [27.05.22, 00:21:30] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation 185.185.217.76
Line 19: Line 19:
 <tr><td><span title="Therefore">∴</span> Some <em>squares</em> are <em>polygons</em>.</td></tr></tbody></table></html> <tr><td><span title="Therefore">∴</span> Some <em>squares</em> are <em>polygons</em>.</td></tr></tbody></table></html>
  
-<html><p class="info-box"></html>* **Note:** When an //existential// conclusion is inferred from //universal// premisses, this requires an (implicit or explicit) [[logic:glossary:existential_import|existential import]], i.e. it must be proven that what the term refers to actually //exists//. In case of the //Modus Barbari// it is sufficient to prove the existence of the //minor term// (<html><abbr title="minor term">S</abbr></html>), as this also implies the existence of <html><abbr title="middle term">M</abbr> and <abbr title="major term">P</abbr>.</p></html>+<html><p class="info-box"></html>* **Note:** When an //existential// conclusion is inferred from //universal// premisses, this requires an (implicit or explicit) [[glossary:existential_import|existential import]], i.e. it must be proven that what the term refers to actually //exists//. In case of the //Modus Barbari// it is sufficient to prove the existence of the //minor term// (<html><abbr title="minor term">S</abbr></html>), as this also implies the existence of <html><abbr title="middle term">M</abbr> and <abbr title="major term">P</abbr>.</p></html>
  
-The //Modus Bamalip// is a weaker form of the [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:index|Modus Barbara]], in which the conclusion is an [[logic:glossary:existential_quantification|existential]] rather than a universal statement. Since every universal quantification that does not refer to an //empty extension set// always implies an //existential quantification//, this variation is possible, but this is of course also a weaker statement than the universal conclusion of the //Modus Barbara//.+The //Modus Bamalip// is a weaker form of the [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:index|Modus Barbara]], in which the conclusion is an [[glossary:existential_quantification|existential]] rather than a universal statement. Since every universal quantification that does not refer to an //empty extension set// always implies an //existential quantification//, this variation is possible, but this is of course also a weaker statement than the universal conclusion of the //Modus Barbara//.
  
 Moreover, this form resembles the [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:modus_bamalip|Modus Bamalip]], except that //middle term// (<html><abbr title="middle term">M</abbr></html>) appears in the other positions in the premises. Moreover, this form resembles the [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:modus_bamalip|Modus Bamalip]], except that //middle term// (<html><abbr title="middle term">M</abbr></html>) appears in the other positions in the premises.
Line 27: Line 27:
 ===== Name ===== ===== Name =====
  
-The name "Barbari " is a [[wp>Mnemonic|mnemonic]] term that helps to remember the most important characteristics of this mode: The "B" at the beginning indicates that it is related to the [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:index|Modus Barbara]], the two "a" for the affirmative [[glossary:universal_quantification|universal]] statements in the premisses and the "i" for the affirmative [[logic:glossary:existential_quantification|existential]] conclusion.+The name "Barbari " is a [[wp>Mnemonic|mnemonic]] term that helps to remember the most important characteristics of this mode: The "B" at the beginning indicates that it is related to the [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:index|Modus Barbara]], the two "a" for the affirmative [[glossary:universal_quantification|universal]] statements in the premisses and the "i" for the affirmative [[glossary:existential_quantification|existential]] conclusion.
  
 ===== See also ===== ===== See also =====
  
-  * [[logic:glossary:existential_import|Existential import]] +  * [[glossary:existential_import|Existential import]] 
-  * [[logic:glossary:existential_quantification|Existential quantification]]+  * [[glossary:existential_quantification|Existential quantification]]
   * [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:index|Modus Barbara]]   * [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:index|Modus Barbara]]
   * [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:modus_bamalip|Modus Bamalip]]   * [[logic:inferences:modus_barbara:modus_bamalip|Modus Bamalip]]

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information