User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
glossary:adjunction [13.04.26, 18:00:14] – [Truth table] saschaglossary:adjunction [13.04.26, 20:16:30] (current) – [Logical symbol] sascha
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 In the context of this website, the <span "vel">∨</span> symbol (pronounced: "<em :la>vel</em> ") is used as a sign for inclusive disjunction. In other publications, symbols like <span "Plus">+</span>, or <span "Parallelen">∥</span>, or others are used with the same meaning. In the context of this website, the <span "vel">∨</span> symbol (pronounced: "<em :la>vel</em> ") is used as a sign for inclusive disjunction. In other publications, symbols like <span "Plus">+</span>, or <span "Parallelen">∥</span>, or others are used with the same meaning.
 +
 +===== Fallacy =====
 +
 +The conflation of //inclusive// and //exclusive// disjunction is one of the possible reasons for committing the fallacy of [[logic:formal_fallacies:affirming_a_disjunct|affirming a disjunct]].
  
 ===== See also ===== ===== See also =====

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information