User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
relevance:ad_hominem:tu_quoque [26.08.26, 08:12:56] – ↷ Page moved from rhetoric:red_herrings:ad_hominem:tu_quoque to relevance:ad_hominem:tu_quoque sascharelevance:ad_hominem:tu_quoque [26.08.26, 08:12:59] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation sascha
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Tu quoque ====== ====== Tu quoque ======
  
-Lat.: "you too!". A form of rhetorical distraction technique ([[rhetoric:red_herrings:index|red herring]]) in which, instead of countering an argument, the person making an argument is attacked (<i :la>[[rhetoric:red_herrings:ad_hominem:index|ad hominem]]</i>) by being accused of holding or having held in the past a different position, or of having behaved inconsistent with the position.+Lat.: "you too!". A form of rhetorical distraction technique ([[rhetoric:red_herrings:index|red herring]]) in which, instead of countering an argument, the person making an argument is attacked (<i :la>[[relevance:ad_hominem:index|ad hominem]]</i>) by being accused of holding or having held in the past a different position, or of having behaved inconsistent with the position.
  
 For example: For example:
Line 12: Line 12:
 ===== Description ===== ===== Description =====
  
-The <i :la>tu quoque</i>-argument is very similar to [[rhetoric:red_herrings:whataboutism|whataboutism]], the difference being that it specifically unfairly attacks the opponent //personally// and thus is a form of <i :la>[[rhetoric:red_herrings:ad_hominem:index|ad hominem]]</i>-argument.+The <i :la>tu quoque</i>-argument is very similar to [[rhetoric:red_herrings:whataboutism|whataboutism]], the difference being that it specifically unfairly attacks the opponent //personally// and thus is a form of <i :la>[[relevance:ad_hominem:index|ad hominem]]</i>-argument.
  
 This is one of the most common unfair attacks in discussions, likely because it is both quite effective in diverting the discussion away from the actual topic and also because it is relatively difficult to counter. This is one of the most common unfair attacks in discussions, likely because it is both quite effective in diverting the discussion away from the actual topic and also because it is relatively difficult to counter.
  
-As used here, this is a form of an "performative <i :la>[[rhetoric:red_herrings:ad_hominem:index|ad hominem]]</i>", i.e. a personal attack based on denying the opponent the right to use a certain argument.+As used here, this is a form of an "performative <i :la>[[relevance:ad_hominem:index|ad hominem]]</i>", i.e. a personal attack based on denying the opponent the right to use a certain argument.
  

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information