User Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
knowledge:epistemic_fallacy [01.08.26, 14:44:33] – [Description] saschaknowledge:epistemic_fallacy [27.08.26, 17:54:48] (current) sascha
Line 56: Line 56:
 This epistemic fallacy specifically concerns the conflation of knowledge and existence. However, there are numerous related fallacies which, in some cases, may also overlap with this one. This epistemic fallacy specifically concerns the conflation of knowledge and existence. However, there are numerous related fallacies which, in some cases, may also overlap with this one.
  
-The [[rhetorics:defeasible_arguments:argument_from_ignorance:index|argument from ignorance]] is a form of //rhetorical fallacy// in which it is claimed that if one has no knowledge of something, then it presumably does not exist (or, more commonly, is not a concern). In many cases, the //epistemic fallacy// is likely to be the underlying misconception behind this practice.+The [[knowledge:ignorance|argument from ignorance]] is a form of //rhetorical fallacy// in which it is claimed that if one has no knowledge of something, then it presumably does not exist (or, more commonly, is not a concern). In many cases, the //epistemic fallacy// is likely to be the underlying misconception behind this practice.
  
 The [[abstraction:ontological_fallacy|ontological fallacy]] is a //fallacy of abstraction// in which the existence of a term or concept is taken to imply that the phenomenon it describes must also exist. If one regards words or concepts as a possible form of expression of knowledge, it is easy to see that, at least in some cases, this overlaps with the //epistemic fallacy.// The [[abstraction:ontological_fallacy|ontological fallacy]] is a //fallacy of abstraction// in which the existence of a term or concept is taken to imply that the phenomenon it describes must also exist. If one regards words or concepts as a possible form of expression of knowledge, it is easy to see that, at least in some cases, this overlaps with the //epistemic fallacy.//
Line 78: Line 78:
  
   * [[abstraction:ontological_fallacy|Ontological fallacy]]   * [[abstraction:ontological_fallacy|Ontological fallacy]]
-  * [[rhetorics:defeasible_arguments:argument_from_ignorance:index|Argument from ignorance]]+  * [[knowledge:ignorance|Argument from ignorance]]
   * [[logic:formal_fallacies:denying_the_antecedent|Denying the antecedent]]   * [[logic:formal_fallacies:denying_the_antecedent|Denying the antecedent]]

This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree, please leave the website.

More information