====== Modus Tollens ====== Abbreviated MT or MTT. One of the most elementary (valid) logical inferences. It is based on a [[glossary:conditional|conditional]] and then denying its [[glossary:consequent|consequent]]. > ''A → B''   – if A, then B. > ''¬B''   –   not B. > ''∴ ¬A''   –  therefore: not A For example, the following is a valid Modus Tollens: > //If// it is raining, [//then//] the street will be wet. > The street is //not// wet. > //Therefore// it does //not// rain. ===== Name ===== The full name of this inference is "modus tollendo tollens". This could be loosely translated as "mode of inferring a denying [statement] by denying [another statement]". ==== Other names ==== * Modus tollendo tollens * Denying the consequent * Negatio consequentiae ===== Fallacies ===== Since the Modus Tollens does not necessarily correspond to the colloquial meaning of statements of the type "if ... then", it is usually perceived as less intuitive than, for example, the [[logic:inferences:modus_ponens|Modus Ponens]]. This may be the reason why erroneous conclusions based on the MT are not uncommon. The following table compares the Modus Tollens and the most important related fallacies:
| ^ //Modus tollens// \\ (valid inference) ^ ^ [[logic:formal_fallacies:affirming the consequent|Affirming the consequent]] \\ (formal fallacy) ^ [[logic:formal_fallacies:denying the antecedent|Denying the antecedent]] \\ (formal fallacy) ^ ^Premise 1 | A → B \\ (if A, then B | | A → B \\ (if A, then B | A → B \\ (if A, then B | ^Premise 2 | ⌐B (not B) | | B | ⌐A (not A) | ^Conclusion | ⌐A (not A) | | A | ⌐B (not B) |
===== See also ===== * [[glossary:conditional|(Material) conditional]] * [[logic:inferences:modus_ponens|Modus (ponendo) ponens]] ===== More information ===== * [[wp>Modus tollens]] on //Wikipedia// {{page>templates:banner#Short-BG-Logic&noheader&nofooter}}