====== Negative conclusion from affirmative premises ====== A [[logic:formal_fallacies:index|formal fallacy]], in particular in [[glossary:syllogism|syllogisms]], where a negative conclusion is (erroneously) inferred from affirmative premises. For example [[app>#AA4O|Open in Syllogism-Finder App]]: > All squares are rectangles. > All rectangles are tetragons. > Therefore, Some tetragons are not squares. ===== Description ===== In principle, no negative conclusions can be drawn from exclusively affirmative (positive) premises. Therefore, a negative conclusion from exclusively affirmative premises is invalid. ===== When are such conclusions valid ===== In a certain cases, affirmative statements (especially all-propositions) can be //transformed// into negative statements (e.g. "all A are B " is equivalent to "no A is not-B "). However, this should be done before formulating the inference and not implicitly. ===== See also ===== * [[glossary:syllogism|Syllogism]] – underlying form of inference. * [[logic:formal_fallacies:affirmative_conclusion_from_negative_premise|Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise]] – Similar form of fallacy. * [[logic:formal_fallacies:exclusive_premises|Fallacy of exclusive premises ]] – Reversal of this form of fallacy. ===== More information ===== * [[wp>Negative conclusion from affirmative premises]] on //Wikipedia// * [[https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/133/Negative-Conclusion-from-Affirmative-Premises|Negative Conclusion from Affirmative Premises]] on //Logically Fallacious// * [[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/negfroma.html|Negative Conclusion from Affirmative Premisses]] on //Fallacy Files//