====== Fallacy of exclusive premises ====== A [[glossary:syllogism|syllogism]] with of //two negative premises// has no valid conclusion. For example [[app>l#EE2E|Open in Syllogism-Finder App]]: > No polygon is a circle. > No rectangle is a circle. > Therefore, no rectangle is a polygon. ===== Description ===== Negative statements have much less descriptive power than positive ones – we learn less about ''A'' from the statement "A is not a tree" than from the statement "A is a house". Therefore, there are a number of restrictions on what can be done with negative statements. Even with only a single negative premise, it is no longer possible to draw any //positive// conclusion ([[logic:formal_fallacies:affirmative_conclusion_from_negative_premise|affirmative conclusion from a negative premise]]). If both premises are negative, there are no ways in which the //middle term// can reliably connect the statements. Therefore, it is not possible to infer a conclusion which connects the major and minor terms. In other words: it is not possible to draw a conclusion. ===== See also ===== * [[logic:formal_fallacies:affirmative_conclusion_from_negative_premise|Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise]] – even a single negative premise means no affirmative conclusion can be drawn * [[logic:formal_fallacies:negative_conclusion_from_affirmative_premises|Negative conclusion from affirmative premises]] – only affirmative premisses don’t allow a negative conclusion * [[glossary:syllogism|Syllogism]] – underlying form of inference. ===== More information ===== * [[wp>Fallacy of exclusive premises]] on //Wikipedia// * [[https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/82/Exclusive-Premises|Exclusive Premises]] on //Logically Fallacious// * [[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/exclprem.html|Exclusive Premisses]] on //Fallacy Files// * [[http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/exclusive_fall.html|Syllogistic Fallacies: Exclusive Premisses]] on the servers of //Lander University//