====== Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise ======
Incorrect application of a [[glossary:syllogism|syllogism]] by deriving an affirmative (positive) conclusion from a negative premise.
For example [[app>#AE1A|Open in Syllogism-Finder App]]:
> All squares are rectangles.
> No circles are squares.
> Therefore, All circles are rectangles.
===== Description =====
One fundamental rule for all syllogistic and similar inferences is that if //one// of the premises is a negative, the conclusion can only also be a negative statement. There are no valid syllogism forms that contradict this rule. Trying to construct one is a [[logic:formal_fallacies:index|formal fallacy]].
Furthermore, if //both// premises are negative, no conclusion can be inferred at all ([[logic:formal_fallacies:exclusive_premises|Fallacy of exclusive premises]]).
===== See also =====
* [[logic:formal_fallacies:exclusive_premises|Fallacy of exclusive premises]] – when //both// premisses are negative.
* [[logic:formal_fallacies:negative_conclusion_from_affirmative_premises|Negative conclusion from affirmative premises]] – Reversal of this form of fallacy.
* [[glossary:syllogism|Syllogism]] – underlying form of inference.
===== More information =====
* [[wp>Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise]] on //Wikipedia//
* [[https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/12/Affirmative-Conclusion-from-a-Negative-Premise|Affirmative Conclusion from a Negative Premise]] on //Logically Fallacious//