====== Statistical syllogism ======
An [[glossary:induction|inductive]] inference that allows to draw a generalised conclusion based on a [[statistics:index|statistical]] proposition.
For example:
> 80 % of all people who come from [[wp>Scandinavia|Scandinavia]] are blond.
> Björn comes from Scandinavia.
> Therefore there is an 80 % probability that Björn is blond.
Such a conclusion is //valid// as long as the statistical probability with which it holds //true// is not ignored.
===== Description =====
It is possible to draw conclusions that are similar in form to a classical [[glossary:syllogism|syllogism]] on the basis of statistical statements.
These come with different limitations and possibilities than the classic forms. For example, the classical [[logic:formal_fallacies:fallacies_of_distribution:index|fallacies of distribution]] do not necessarily apply, if the distribution is indicated by a statistical dimension.
Conversely, as with all inductive conclusions, the conclusion is only //true// with a certain probability, which may change at any time due to additional or changed information.
Not least, because [[glossary:induction|inductive]] rather than [[glossary:deduction|deductive]] reasoning is involved, we need to be aware of possible [[logic:induction:index|fallacies of induction]] that may apply.
==== Ecological fallacy ====
The term “[[logic:induction:ecological_fallacy|ecological fallacy]]” refers to an //inadmissible// transfer of a statistical property from a higher aggregation level to a lower one.
The above example avoids this by including the probability with which this is //true// in the conclusion. If that metric was omitted, it would appear as if //every// Scandinavian was //guaranteed// to be blonde, which is of course not a valid conclusion:
> 80 % of all people who come from Scandinavia are blond.
> Björn comes from Scandinavia.
> Therefore: Björn is blond.
For more information, see: [[logic:induction:ecological_fallacy|Ecological fallacy]].
==== Measure of confidence ====
In many cases, a [[wp>Confidence interval|confidence interval]] or other statistical metric can be used instead of percentages. In some contexts, a qualifying adjective such as “many”, “most” or similar may also be appropriate – although these are of course quite imprecise and can easily lead to discussions as to whether a conclusion based on such vague statements is in fact valid.
===== See also =====
* [[logic:induction:ecological_fallacy|Ecological fallacy]]
* [[glossary:syllogism|Syllogism]]
===== More information =====
* [[wp>Statistical syllogism|Statistical syllogism]] on //Wikipedia//
{{page>templates:banner#Short-BG-Logic&noheader&nofooter}}