====== (Material) conditional ====== In logic, a //conditional// is a statement that expresses an "if - then" relationship. For example: > //If// it rains, //then// the road gets wet. In natural language, the keyword "then" is often omitted; "If" can also be replaced by "when", depending on context. ===== Other names ===== * (Material) implication * Subjunction ===== Description ===== A "if … then" relationship seems intuitively graspable at first glance, but the logical //conditional// statement has a rather unintuitive pitfall: a //false// [[glossary:antecedent|antecedent]] will lead to a //true// overall statement. This contradicts the usage in everyday language and can lead to so-called "[[glossary:vacuous_truth|vacuous truths]]", i.e. statements that are logically //true// but without significance. ^ A ^ B ^ A → B ^ | true | true | true | | true | false | false | | false | false | true | | false | false | true | ==== Terminology ==== In a conditional statement (e.g. "''//if// A, //then// B''"), the term following the "''if''" (here: ''A'') is called the [[glossary:antecedent|antecedent]], the term following "''then''" (here: ''B'') is called [[glossary:consequent|consequent]] or sometimes //consequence//. ==== Causality ==== A subjunction statement does //not// imply [[glossary:causality|causality]], but rather only //correlation//. This does not exclude the possibility of a causal relationship between //antecedent// and //consequent//, but is not implied or assumed. ==== Commutativity ==== Unlike many other logical operations, //subjunction// is //not commutative//, i.e. antecedent and consequent cannot simply be interchanged. Illicitly commuting antecedent and consequent is known as the fallacy of "[[logic:formal_fallacies:affirming_the_consequent|affirming the consequent]]". ==== Vacuous truths ==== The colloquial use of an "if ... then" statement differs from that in logic: for example, we intuitively assume that if the antecedent is irrelevant to the statement, the overall statement must be false. For example, in the following: > //If// the sky is green, [//then//] the earth is flat. Although this statement is obviously nonsensical, it would be a "true" statement according to the rules of logic (see [[glossary:vacuous_truth|vacuous truth]]). There are various approaches to resolving this contradiction, such as [[wp>Relevance logic|relevance logic]]. However, these are out of scope for this site. ===== See also ===== * [[glossary:equivocation:index|Equivocation]] * [[logic:formal_fallacies:four-term_fallacy:index|Four-term fallacy]] ===== More information ===== * [[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/ambimidd.html|Ambiguous Middle Term]] on //Fallacy Files// * [[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Four-term_fallacy|Four-term fallacy]] on //RationalWiki//