====== (Material) conditional ======
In logic, a //conditional// is a statement that expresses an "if - then" relationship.
For example:
> //If// it rains, //then// the road gets wet.
In natural language, the keyword "then" is often omitted; "If" can also be replaced by "when", depending on context.
===== Other names =====
* (Material) implication
* Subjunction
===== Description =====
A "if … then" relationship seems intuitively graspable at first glance, but the logical //conditional// statement has a rather unintuitive pitfall: a //false// [[glossary:antecedent|antecedent]] will lead to a //true// overall statement.
This contradicts the usage in everyday language and can lead to so-called "[[glossary:vacuous_truth|vacuous truths]]", i.e. statements that are logically //true// but without significance.
^ A ^ B ^ A → B ^
| true | true | true |
| true | false | false |
| false | false | true |
| false | false | true |
==== Terminology ====
In a conditional statement (e.g. "''//if// A, //then// B''"), the term following the "''if''" (here: ''A'') is called the [[glossary:antecedent|antecedent]], the term following "''then''" (here: ''B'') is called [[glossary:consequent|consequent]] or sometimes //consequence//.
==== Causality ====
A subjunction statement does //not// imply [[glossary:causality|causality]], but rather only //correlation//. This does not exclude the possibility of a causal relationship between //antecedent// and //consequent//, but is not implied or assumed.
==== Commutativity ====
Unlike many other logical operations, //subjunction// is //not commutative//, i.e. antecedent and consequent cannot simply be interchanged.
Illicitly commuting antecedent and consequent is known as the fallacy of "[[logic:formal_fallacies:affirming_the_consequent|affirming the consequent]]".
==== Vacuous truths ====
The colloquial use of an "if ... then" statement differs from that in logic: for example, we intuitively assume that if the antecedent is irrelevant to the statement, the overall statement must be false. For example, in the following:
> //If// the sky is green, [//then//] the earth is flat.
Although this statement is obviously nonsensical, it would be a "true" statement according to the rules of logic (see [[glossary:vacuous_truth|vacuous truth]]).
There are various approaches to resolving this contradiction, such as [[wp>Relevance logic|relevance logic]]. However, these are out of scope for this site.
===== See also =====
* [[glossary:equivocation:index|Equivocation]]
* [[logic:formal_fallacies:four-term_fallacy:index|Four-term fallacy]]
===== More information =====
* [[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/ambimidd.html|Ambiguous Middle Term]] on //Fallacy Files//
* [[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Four-term_fallacy|Four-term fallacy]] on //RationalWiki//